…I think not, but I’d really have to try all three:)
Ugh! Slept for shit last night due to going to bed at 1 AM and then being awakened 4 times throughout the night. Winker woke me twice, Grace woke me once and that middle aged need to get up and take a leak got me once. It’s gonna be a long day.
In the nearly inevitable other news, I’ve decided to re-read books I’ve only read once or haven’t read in at least 25-30 years. First up is The Hobbit, followed by The Lord Of The Rings. I’ve only read them once, back in late September 1976, while I was waiting to get out of the Navy. Thanks to some creative thinking and decisive action, I managed to have 10 days with nothing to do before I got out on October 4, so among other things, I read those books. It will be interesting to read them again at a more leisurely pace (I read them in 4 days flat the first time) and with movie images now firmly burned into my brain.
In final news, I still have not watched Doctor Horrible’s Sing Along Blog yet. Will do that tonight.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.
Re: Your original question: No, we get exponentially more awesome.